GOP’s Brady whacks Madigan, proposes term limits

September 25, 2009 by Brady for Illinois  
Filed under In the News

ct_small_blog
Chicago Tribune
September 22, 2009
Posted by Rick Pearson at 11:35 a.m.

State Sen. Bill Brady, a Republican candidate for governor, today assailed the control Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan has over state government and proposed term limits, a return to multi-member House districts and campaign finance reforms.

“We have reached a point where too few people control too much and the power is too concentrated,” Brady said. “There’s no question that the speaker of the House, representing little over 100,000 people, has had absolute control over the state of Illinois. He’s been able to do that for nearly three decades and it’s time for that to end.”

Brady proposed a combination of state constitutional amendments and legislation to implement what he called his government reform package.

But the Bloomington Republican, who has spent seven years in the House and a like amount of time in the Senate, acknowledged it was unlikely that the Democratic-dominated legislature would put the constitutional changes on the November 2010 general election ballot. Madigan, of Chicago, has served as speaker of the House for 24 of the past 26 years.

Brady, who finished third among the four major candidates in the 2006 GOP primary for governor, proposed a state constitutional amendment that would limit state lawmakers to 10 years and statewide elected officials to 12 years. Lawmakers who are forced out because of term limits could return in six years.

He also proposed a return to what’s known as cumulative voting for the House. Under his plan, the Senate would be trimmed from 59 members to 41, with three House members elected from each Senate district.

Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn led a push in 1980 that eliminated the cumulative voting system. Critics have said eliminating that system paved the way for increased one-party control of the legislature and dominance by top legislative leaders.

Brady also called for the adoption of campaign donation reforms that conform to the current federal limits of $2,300 per election. He chided Democratic leaders and Quinn for first passing, then vetoing a complicated campaign finance limit plan that critics said was filled with loopholes.

Brady also said he had no favorite for a lieutenant governor running mate among a field of several lesser-known candidates. He criticized former GOP state chairman Andy McKenna of Chicago, a new entry in the governor’s race, for “deal making” in running with state Sen. Matt Murphy of Palatine. Murphy dropped his bid for governor to run with McKenna as lieutenant governor.

Along with Brady and McKenna, other candidates for the Republican nomination for governor include state Sen. Kirk Dillard of Hinsdale, DuPage County Board Chairman Bob Schillerstrom of Naperville, political pundit and operative Dan Proft of Chicago and transparency advocate Adam Andrzejewski of Hinsdale.

Dillard unveiled his ethics reform proposals last week.

Comments

2 Comments on "GOP’s Brady whacks Madigan, proposes term limits"

  1. Capital Times is all wrong on bashing term limits in Wisconsin. « North Shore Exponent on Mon, 19th Oct 2009 9:43 pm 

    [...] Some people may like Illinois Governor candidate Bill Brady’s plan for term limits in which if….  I may disagree that Governor and Attorney General is limited to three terms and should be limited to two, Brady’s thought out reform is a start for Illinois.  Scott Walker is for term limits and right now there could be a second term limits wave coming to Wisconsin. [...]

  2. Jimmy D on Wed, 4th Nov 2009 1:58 pm 

    Unfortunately, I don’t believe there is any political offical that has any morals. Case in point.

    Workers Comp in the State of Illinois. When you can’t get what the law says no fault for limited liability to the insurance carries for QUICK payment of medical and 2/3 of your wages
    When the mandated 180 day 19b-1 emergency motion was put into law it was widely used but the state was in violation of its own state law for not complying with thousands 19b-1 motions filed for getting the injured worker through the arbitrator and the appeal to the commission if there was one.
    The insurance carries starve the injured with excessive litigation and the state now chooses to NOT hear the only motion that should be filed by ones attorney for the injured a 19b-1. But again the state refused to hear them which puts the injured into years of litigation with awarding 19k (penalties) or section 16 (lawyers fee’s)……….the attorneys love it.(they make more money) the state cleans up its fiscal yearly reports and the injured worker gets stuck with the bill…..all to the delight of the insurance carriers……..What a Government…..if you been litigating at the IWCC for NON-payment of workers Comp……ask your attorney WHY he didn’t file a 19b-1 one emergency motion for you. If he didn’t SUE HIM.
    PS these crooked arbitrators can make any ruling they want in your favor but just try and get the insurance carrier to pay……….PLUS……….the statute is discriminatory because they treat state workers differently…….they are not allowed to go beyond the commission……WHY!…..you figure it out……..

    Warm Wishes………..Jimmy

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!